On 30 October 31 took part in discussions at the initiative of Christian Ducu oganizate for Ethical Management, Corporate Strategy and Sustainable Development, an attempt, without success, I see unfortunately, to gather together "people from libraries' business people to discuss issues of business ethics. Perhaps the absence of the latter was largely due to location, the Faculty of Philosophy (a great seat, I'd also like to SNSPA such environment, but the argument that Povernei headquarters is located in downtown should be arhisuficient us for our satisfied with what we have). Why say that? Because maybe if the invitation was for Hilton or Marriott, no doubt that would have come more
manageri.Asta e. After two days I started to think seriously that corporate social responsibility needs direction. Until now, its direction is towards the Romanian public relations. Being a corporation that grants an equivalent budget for CSR activities for us to do PR with Facebook to promote, something to do so with the benefit of all corporate, rather than to the office. Here
admit .. I am facing a dilemma on the premise that what is not covered in the mass media means that there is, and if the CSR is a kind of hair precisely that social-oriented activities of a corporation is made public. Then we can talk about CSR if it is not made public? It's like charity, the idea that the result counts: donate money to a seriously ill child for it to do good and do not know that your name be known. We make a comparison with CSR? After all, the most important is the result: a healthier environment, more green, a vigorous ethics policy ... no matter the name.
manageri.Asta e. After two days I started to think seriously that corporate social responsibility needs direction. Until now, its direction is towards the Romanian public relations. Being a corporation that grants an equivalent budget for CSR activities for us to do PR with Facebook to promote, something to do so with the benefit of all corporate, rather than to the office. Here
admit .. I am facing a dilemma on the premise that what is not covered in the mass media means that there is, and if the CSR is a kind of hair precisely that social-oriented activities of a corporation is made public. Then we can talk about CSR if it is not made public? It's like charity, the idea that the result counts: donate money to a seriously ill child for it to do good and do not know that your name be known. We make a comparison with CSR? After all, the most important is the result: a healthier environment, more green, a vigorous ethics policy ... no matter the name.
0 comments:
Post a Comment